Video of the day
December 4, 2012 Leave a comment
Via Kottke, this is awesome– 5 hours of landings compressed into 30 seconds (as always with Vimeo, you can watch a larger HD version at the link):
Politics, health care, science, education, and pretty much anything I find interesting
December 4, 2012 Leave a comment
Via Kottke, this is awesome– 5 hours of landings compressed into 30 seconds (as always with Vimeo, you can watch a larger HD version at the link):
December 4, 2012 3 Comments
Presumably you are already aware that America is a much more religious nation than most all other modern Democracies. Here’s a nice summary from Gallup on some of the key correlates of religiosity:
I find the age one interesting. So, you get away from your parents and decide that religion is not so great. You get more religious when you have kids, presumably, and then when death seems not far away, that’s really the time for God. I’d also love to know more about the universal gender gap in religiosity– what’s going on there? The political one– that’s well-trod territory.
December 4, 2012 Leave a comment
I had no idea Europeans hated peanut butter. It’s so good! Via Planet Money:
December 4, 2012 3 Comments
The latest Washington Post poll finds that Republicans will be disproportionately blamed (as they should) if we should go over the “fiscal cliff.” I think some of the underlying data in the latest Gallup on the matter is quite telling.
Democrats overwhelmingly support Obama 86-9. Republicans only support their leaders in Congress by a 56-39 margin. Wow. Huge advantage Obama. And although Republican rank-and-file is typically much less prone towards compromise than Democrats that’s not a much the case here:
Short version: pretty much all the political pressure to give in is on the Republicans. Doesn’t mean they will, but you’d sure want to have Obama’s hand in these negotiations.
December 4, 2012 3 Comments
A pretty cool series of photos of inside an Amazon.com warehouse. That’s where most of the Christmas gifts I give are going to originate:
December 4, 2012 Leave a comment
So, one area where the Democrats might give in on the “fiscal cliff” negotiations would be a raising the Medicare age from 65 to 67 or so. This would save the federal government almost $6 billion dollars. Alas, it would cost the American public an additional $11.4 billion in health spending. Here’s the key chart:
Yes, it certainly is more reasonable now that 65 and 66 year olds could get insurance thanks to the ACA, but the truth is that Medicare is way more efficient at delivering quality health care and this would lead to a substantial increase in overall health care spending. There’s just no serious argument that that’s a good thing. As the CBPP people put it:
The fundamental purpose of deficit reduction is to strengthen the economy over the long term. The relentless rise in health care costs is the key driver of projected long-term deficits that policymakers must address. But reducing federalhealth care costs by raising state and private-sector health care costs even more makes little sense, as it only increases the burden that health care costs place on the economy as a whole. The goal should be to slow the growth of health care costs system-wide, while extending coverage to all Americans. This proposal does just the opposite on both fronts — raising costs system-wide and increasing the ranks of the uninsured.
Sarah Kliff has a nice summary of why exactly this is so bad at Wonkblog.
Recent Comments