August 28, 2016 Leave a comment
1) Ed Kilgore’s headline gets it, “Media False Equivalence Is Trump’s Best Friend in the Debate Over Racism.”
2) Both Drum and ThinkProgress deconstruct a horrible AP story about “conspiracy theories” in both campaigns. Of course, the reality is that Trump’s campaign is rife with them and Hillary doesn’t need any conspiracy theories– Trump’s reality is plenty. But, damn, the AP is horrible lately.
3) Philip Bump on the lack of notable Republicans defending Trump on race.
4) Bill Ayers recently reposted a post of his on the false equivalence between racism and being accused of racism.
5) Harry Enten on how Gary Johnson is decidedly not fading in the polls.
Why is Johnson’s support proving more durable than past third-party candidates’? The most obvious answer is that Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are extremely unpopular for major party presidential nominees; if third-party voters eventually settled on a major party nominee in past campaigns for fear of “wasting their vote,” they may be less willing to settle this year. (Of course, Johnson’s support may simply fade later than past third-party candidates.)
6) On the inadequacy of criminal law for dealing with bureaucratic malfeasance.
7) Aarron Carroll on how Epipen pricing represents so much of what’s wrong with American health care.
8) Very interesting interview with Uwe Reinhardt on why he thinks the health care exchanges are doomed. Why? We’re not really all that serious about the mandate.
9) Aarron Carroll again on simple rules for healthy eating. Nothing surprising, but nicely laid out.
10) I did not know about “legacy” board games. Sounds pretty cool. Going to have to give this a try one of these days. For now, love playing “Seven Wonders” any chance I get. Somehow my son, David, is just unstoppable at that game. Only managed to beat him once.
11) NYT Editorial on the not ransom to Iran.
12) I did enjoy the “moron’s case for Hillary Clinton”
OK, listen up. Nobody cares about emails that show Bono wanted State Department assistance to stream his music from the International Space Station. You should thank Almighty God and Jedi Jebus he failed. So far all we have seen is a public official in extraordinary circumstances who should have known better demonstrate “extreme carelessness” to which I believe she has owned up to sufficiently and which, by the way, no wrongdoing was ever uncovered even after a year-long investigation by the FBI for the love of God. We all know that trustworthiness is important in a President. But if absolutely no slack is given at all, and I mean none, if this is how we treat people who make public service their life and profession, then you will always get “crooks” as politicians because who in their right mind would want the job? It’s like being a firefighter. When there’s a fire everybody runs out. You run in. It’s a maniac’s job but it has to be done so let’s have the best do it and not get wrapped up in what amounts to paperwork. That’s all this really is. Paperwork. You would rather stay at home or vote for someone George Orwell or Edgar Allan Poe couldn’t have dreamed up over emails? Then you’re even dumber than you look…
I know, I know. Damn it all! Wouldn’t it be nice if we could just forget all of that pesky accomplishment stuff of hers and remember that what really matters is the thrill of waiting for indictments which makes for great television? That way we could finally “lock her up” and enough with these stupid women who think they can run a country. Well, enough out of YOU, you moron. This isn’t the lesser of two evils. This is a choice between one great and qualified candidate for the nation’s highest office who you really should be excited about and a dolt with a bad toupee who if you were honest with yourself you wouldn’t trust to manage a Dairy Queen much less the Oval Office.
13) Parents pushing back against too much homework. And pretty much any homework more than a few minutes a day in elementary school just isn’t worth it.
14) High school teacher on teaching Donald Trump:
Thus, while I am always careful about how and when to show my biases, I’m not worried about appearing biased if my stance is against bigotry and in defense of moral reason and the scholarly use of evidence, logic, and research. Just as the notions of media neutrality collapse under threats to democracy, so too do notions of teacher neutrality. We can’t be silent. And I’m confident we won’t be.
15) University of Chicago is drawing plenty of attention for it’s letter against intellectual “safe spaces” on campus. You will be not surprised to know I’m with them on this.
16) Greg Koger on the Clinton Foundation emails:
Washington, DC, is suffering a severe shortage of smelling salts this morning as newsbroke suggesting a correlation between financial contributions and gaining access to a political figure. In this case, the contributions were to the Clinton Foundation and the politician is Hillary Clinton, so this is being cast as a violation of the norms of our nation’s capital.
If only there were prior political science research testing whether contributors were more likely to gain access to political figures…Actually, there has been a mountain of evidence that this is common practice, as you can see in my all-too-brief list of citations. The most recent of these works is a field experiment in which an interest group solicited meetings with congressional offices and revealed to some of these offices that potential donors would be at the meeting.
The “potential donors” were more likely to be scheduled for meetings and were more likely to meet with members of Congress or top staffers than average citizens making the same request (summaries here, here, and here).
Of course, the link between money and access is no surprise to the seasoned Washingtonian. It plays out over breakfast, lunch, cocktails, and dinner at restaurantsand venues across town, and at sad callcenters where telemarketers wonder why they ever ran for Congress. And the other major presidential candidate is an avowed participant in the pay-to-say-hi game. What’s really shocking is the feigned shock.
17) Washington Post movie critic Ann Hornaday argues that this summer’s hits and misses demonstrate that studios still need to pay attention to good directing, story, etc. Well, hopefully that’s true.
18) So, actually binged “Stranger Things” in about a week. Not great, but how would I not like a series with 12-year old protagonists who play D&D set in 1983 and involving supernatural thrills. Not sure I would have stuck with it, but worked great at 1.4-1.6x speed. The enjoyment was all plot (not so much dialogue and character), so keeping the plot moving really helped.