June 27, 2015 Leave a comment
1) It’s hard out there for a pollster. Nice piece on why it is getting harder and harder to do accurate polling these days.
2) It’s going to be harder than ever for NC to have enough good teachers given how the Republicans in charge feel about education.
3) Wonkblog with a great series of maps on America’s ethnic/racial demographics.
4) Europe’s biggest problem (one we fortunately do not share) is it’s low birth rate.
5) The destruction of defendant’s rights.
6) How working mothers are good for kis:
The researchers find statistically significant differences in outcomes for both boys and girls, though the outcomes are different.
- Daughters of working moms grow up to earn more money, in part because daughters of working moms are more likely to be employed and more likely to be employed in a supervisory role.
- Sons of working moms don’t have significantly different economic outcomes, but dogrow up to be more likely to spend time taking care of family members or doing household chores.
In other words, the adult children of mothers who held jobs when they were little kids are likely to grow up as adults who are somewhat less gender-conforming. Their daughters “lean in” more in the labor market, and their sons “lean in” more at home.
7) With all the other big Supreme Court news (yeah, I’ll get to Obergefell), hardly anybody noticed part of the new deal getting rolled back with a ruling on raisins. Yes, raisins.
8) Another little noticed, but important, Supreme Court case on race and criminal justice.
9) The NC legislature wants to eliminate Driver’s Ed (my oldest just finished the classroom portion a week ago). There may or not be good reasons to do this, but their justification is embarrassing.
Their argument for no longer requiring 120,000 teenagers to take drivers ed is that it is too expensive for families. The reason that it is too expensive for families is the Senate Republicans ended the state’s $26m appropriation to teach it, putting cost on families. Gotta admire their audacity if not their logic.
10) With Seinfeld coming to Hulu, loved Todd VanDerWerf with a piece on how Seinfeld changed television. And Matt Zoller Seitz writes about how Seinfeld paved the way for the TV anti-hero we are so familiar with now.
11) Fascinating story of a a DC area man recorded the horrible things an anesthesiologist said about him while he was under. He won a bunch in a lawsuit.
12) Tom Edsall with a really good piece on why don’t the poor rise up:
People today, Ray continues, “are not only able to make choices in an ever-expanding range of situations, but they are also compelled to do so.”
In effect, individualization is a double-edged sword. In exchange for new personal freedoms and rights, beneficiaries are agreeing to, if not being forced to, assume new risks and responsibilities.
In addition to opening the door to self-fulfillment, “the rise of individual rights and freedoms has its price,” writes Nikolai Genov, a sociologist at the Berlin Free University in “Challenges of Individualization,” published earlier this year.
Placing an exclusive stress on the expansion of rights and freedoms of individuals by disregarding or underrating the concomitant rise of individual responsibilities brings about social pathologies. They undermine solidarity as the glue of social life.
As a result, individualization can come “at the expense of various forms of common good in general, and of various forms of solidarity in particular,” Genov observes…
All of which brings us back to the question of why there is so little rebellion against entrenched social and economic injustice.
The answer is that those bearing the most severe costs of inequality are irrelevant to the agenda-setters in both parties. They are political orphans in the new order. They may have a voice in urban politics, but on the national scene they no longer fit into the schema of the left or the right. They are pushed to the periphery except for a brief moment on Election Day when one party wants their votes counted, and the other doesn’t.