February 6, 2016 18 Comments
1) The State Superintendent of Public Instruction in NC suggested that NC teachers get a 10% pay raise, which would still not even bring us up to the national average. NC Republicans, of course, think this idea entirely untenable.
2) Can we start expecting kids to get kicked out of school based on their DNA? Maybe. Here’s one case.
3) Great look at the http://www.vox.com/2016/2/5/10918164/donald-trump-morality of the presidential candidates. Some of what you would expect; some you wouldn’t.
4) An Iowa voter confronts Cruz with the reality of taking Obamacare away.
5) Why are American colleges obsessed with leadership? Good question. We can’t all be leaders.
6) Great Chronicle of Higher Ed interview with the Virginia Tech professor behind the Flint/lead story:
Q. Do you have any sense that perverse incentive structures prevented scientists from exposing the problem in Flint sooner?
A. Yes, I do. In Flint the agencies paid to protect these people weren’t solving the problem. They were the problem. What faculty person out there is going to take on their state, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency?
I don’t blame anyone, because I know the culture of academia. You are your funding network as a professor. You can destroy that network that took you 25 years to build with one word. I’ve done it. When was the last time you heard anyone in academia publicly criticize a funding agency, no matter how outrageous their behavior? We just don’t do these things.
If an environmental injustice is occurring, someone in a government agency is not doing their job. Everyone we wanted to partner said, Well, this sounds really cool, but we want to work with the government. We want to work with the city. And I’m like, You’re living in a fantasy land, because these people are the problem.
7) This history of Japan video is almost too awesome to be believed. Seriously, trust me on this.
8) Is Dodd-Frank perfect? No. Is it actually working? Yes, says Drum (and the data). A more elaborate post on the same topic from Wonkblog (nicely titled “What Republicans and Bernie Sanders get wrong about Wall Street.”)
9) NFL stadiums are such a rip-off to their communities. Let the damn owners pay for them. St Louis will still be saddled with debt for a stadium that now becomes a white elephant.
10) Very nice piece on all that’s wrong with the college admissions process. I don’t plan on encouraging my own kids to apply for anything more elite than our fine NC universities in part because the process has become so nuts.
11) Loved this Dylan Matthews case against NH and Iowa always being first. Especially this Part
Iowa and New Hampshire have plenty of defenders. Their arguments are all bad. The most serious attempt to defend Iowa’s place in the system is the 2010 book Why Iowa?by political scientists David Redlawsk, Caroline Tolbert, and Todd Donovan. They argue that the caucus system creates more informed (albeit fewer) voters, and that the sequential primary system lets candidates be heard and informs voters in later primaries.
They put together a good argument, but it’s not an argument for Iowa. It’s an argument for sequential voting. Indeed, the authors conclude with a proposal for a “caucus window,”in which any number of states could hold caucuses, followed by a national primary.
“We suggest that the national parties could opt for a process in which any number of states could hold caucuses on the first voting day of the sequence,” they write. “Another alternative would have the parties retaining a sequence in which Iowa, or some other relatively small state, is granted first-in-the-nation priority.”
At most, the virtues of caucuses and sequential primaries argue for having one small state go first. But they don’t argue for that state being Iowa or New Hampshire.
12) Lessons from Flint about how we make weather and climate (and much environmental) policy.
13) What happens to your brain when you get stoned every day for five years? It’s not great, but not as bad as you might think.
14) Loved this Onion headline, “Middle-Aged Man In Gym Locker Room Puts Shirt On Before Underwear.” Used to see a guy like this at the OSU gym all the time and it bugged the hell out of me.
15) The real reason I’m supporting Hillary– her campaign spends the most on pizza.
16) Ezra Klein with a good take on Thursday’s debate:
And where Clinton’s experience gives her deep knowledge of virtually every facet of American policymaking, Sanders’s career has let him focus on the issues he cares about, and left him poorly informed on international affairs.
Which is all to say that Clinton has the benefits and drawbacks of an insider, and Sanders has the benefits and drawbacks of an outsider. Her view of the political system is realistic, her knowledge of the issues is deep, and her social ties are strong. All these qualities would likely make her an effective president. But they also mean she’s captured by the political system, and that she is implicated in virtually everything Americans hate about it.
Sanders’s view of the political system is idealistic, his ideas are unbounded by pragmatic concerns and interest group objections, and his calls for political revolution are thrilling. All these qualities make him an inspiring candidate. But they also mean he’ll be perceived as an enemy by the very system he intends to lead, and that his promises of sweeping change might collapse into total disappointment.
17) We’ve reached the point where conservatives have deluded themselves into believing there’s actually more racism against white people than Black people. And I’ve got a bridge I want to sell you.
18) The government changed the font on highways signs to make them more readable. Apparently, in real world conditions they actually were not so the font is changing back.
19) Drug shortages are leading to some real rationing and some real hard decisions.