July 9, 2016 4 Comments
1) Was prepared to not like this piece blaming feminists for anti-feminism. But really liked the bit about “mansplaining.” I have way too often simply seen this term as a way to shut down discussion than as a legitimate critique of unnecessary explanation.
Whatever the reasons for the current cycle of misandry — yes, that’s a word, derided but also adopted for ironic use by many feminists — its existence is quite real. Consider, for example, the number of neologisms that use “man” as a derogatory prefix and that have entered everyday media language: “mansplaining,” “manspreading” and “manterrupting.” Are these primarily male behaviors that justify the gender-specific terms? Not necessarily: The study that is cited as evidence of excessive male interruption of women actually found that the most frequent interrupting is female-on-female (“femterrupting”?).
In fairness, though, I still think plain old misogyny is responsible for most anti-feminism.
2) Sonia Sotomayor is taking on our criminal justice system through her dissents:
Justice Sotomayor would go on to write eight dissents before the term ended last Monday. Read together, they are a remarkable body of work from an increasingly skeptical student of the criminal justice system, one who has concluded that it is clouded by arrogance and machismo and warped by bad faith and racism.
3) In New Jersey, even death does not get you out from under your student loans. It’s ugly.
4) Apparently Amazon is moving away from even showing (typically misleading) list prices on it’s items. Really interesting discussion of pricing and business practices.
5) I think this piece over simplifies, but I don’t doubt at all that the nature of human communities shapes the fundamental values of those communities. In this, “farmers” and today’s working class are the authoritarians and the elites and their egalitarian values are the modern day “foragers.” Alas, no discussion of the fascinating idea that honor cultures are an extension of herding societies.
6) Jeffrey Toobin on Clarence Thomas’ unique take on the Constitution:
The abortion dissent explains why Thomas is so cut off on the Court, even from his fellow-conservatives. He doesn’t respect the Court’s precedents. He is so convinced of the wisdom of his approach to the law that he rejects practically the whole canon of constitutional law. It’s an act of startling self-confidence, but a deeply isolating one as well. Even his ideological allies, who mostly come out the same way on cases, recognize that they must dwell within the world that their colleagues and predecessors created. Thomas, in contrast, has his own constitutional law, which he alone honors and applies.
7) A pretty entertaining take on the meaning of “Make America Great Again.”
8) This was a bit of a pain to set up, but given that I have unlimited free Google Drive space through NCSU, this is my new automatic backup system.
9) Turn your anxiety into excitement. I’ve got a progeny or two to whom I’m going to show this video.
11) The headline says it all, “The FDA’s Abstinence-Only Approach to Eating Cookie Dough Is Unrealistic and Alarmist.”
12) Loved this column from Josh Levin explaining the logic of Kevin Durant’s decision. Levin is generally about 2-3 analytical planes beyond most people who write about sports.
13) Where ordinary people and nutritionists disagree about what’s healthy (people way over-estimate the healthiness of granola and orange juice, among others And seriously, people actually think frozen yogurt is healthy?!).
14) Great Pete Wehner column on the theology of Donald Trump and his troubling embrace by evangelical leaders:
This fulsome embrace of Mr. Trump is rather problematic, since he embodies a worldview that is incompatible with Christianity. If you trace that worldview to its source, Christ would not be anywhere in the vicinity.
Time and again Mr. Trump has shown contempt for those he perceives as weak and vulnerable — “losers,” in his vernacular. They include P.O.W.s, people with disabilities, those he deems physically unattractive and those he considers politically powerless. He bullies and threatens people he believes are obstacles to his ambitions. He disdains compassion and empathy, to the point where his instinctive response to the largest mass shooting in American history was to congratulate himself: “Appreciate the congrats for being right.”
What Mr. Trump admires is strength. For him, a person’s intrinsic worth is tied to worldly success and above all to power. He never seems free of his obsession with it. In his comments to that gathering of evangelicals, Mr. Trump said this: “And I say to you folks, because you have such power, such influence. Unfortunately the government has weeded it away from you pretty strongly. But you’re going to get it back. Remember this: If you ever add up, the men and women here are the most important, powerful lobbyists. You’re more powerful. Because you have men and women, you probably have something like 75, 80 percent of the country believing. But you don’t use your power. You don’t use your power.”
In eight sentences Mr. Trump mentioned some variation of power six times, to a group of individuals who have professed their love and loyalty to Jesus, who in his most famous sermon declared, “Blessed are the poor in spirit” and “Blessed are the meek,” who said, “My strength is made perfect in weakness,” and who was humiliated and crucified by the powerful.
15) I’ve read A Wrinkle in Time several times. Never had put much thought into the meaning of the giant, evil brain, though. Constance Grady does in Vox.
16) Dylan Matthews extensively details just horrific bull-fighting is.
17) In discussion about Trump’s potential VP pick on the most recent Slate political gabfest, John Dickerson pointed out that basically anybody with any hopes of a real political future in the Republican Party has withdrawn from consideration. Whomever it is, should definitely be interesting.
18) Hippotherapy is awesome. Need to do more of this with my son, Alex.
19) Open tab for too long… There’s way too many lame non-profit, private colleges. Or, as this article states, “The Quality Crisis at America’s Private, Non-Profit Colleges.” Or my take– non-elite private colleges: the worst value in higher education.