Quick hits (part I)
March 25, 2017 Leave a comment
1) Best on-line auto part ever.
2) Dahlia Lithwick on Gorsuch’s views on religious liberty:
It’s not just the great deference Gorsuch shows religious adherents that is worrisome. He also believes that the views of religious adherents are beyond factual debate. Again in the Hobby Lobby case, he wrote that companies must pay for “drugs or devices that can have the effect of destroying a fertilized human egg.” That claim is simply false, even with regard to Plan B. It is a religious conclusion, not a medical or legal one. Whether that view is his or he simply declines to probe whether the religious conclusion is accurate, the effect is the same: He has written into a legal opinion a religious “fact” not supported by medical science.
This kind of thinking matters especially when the tremendous respect for religious dissenters is not balanced against the harms incurred by nonadherents. Gorsuch sometimes minimizes or outright rejects the third-party harms of religious accommodations. As Yuvraj Joshi points out at NBC, “while the Supreme Court’s decision in Hobby Lobby considered the impact of the case on women, Judge Gorsuch’s opinion does not even acknowledge the harmful effects of denying access to reproductive health care on female employees and dependents. Instead, his sole concern is for religious objectors who feel complicit in the allegedly sinful conduct of others.”
What that means going into this week’s hearings is that religious liberty works only one way. All of this tremendous deference to the religious sensitivities of the objectors is balanced against, well, no solicitude at all for the interests on the opposing side.
3) Even the former police chief of Greenville, NC takes way too much grief from Trump’s Border Patrol. Of course, his name is Hassan Aden.
4) This is pretty cool– how chickens can help save threatened wildlife (short version: by being a far more sustainable food source).
5) What the TSA budget should cut (air marshals) and should not cut (pilot training and more).
6) Loved Thomas Frank’s Success and Luck . Somehow, I missed this piece in the Atlantic last year on how we way undervalue the role of luck in our successes. Conservatives, of course, are especially guilty of this.
7) Six police wearing body cameras were involved in a shooting, yet, somewhat mysteriously none of them have footage of the key moments.
8) Just so we’re clear– and Steve Coll certainly is on such matters– Tillerson is proving to be a horrible Secretary of State. Very bad choice for a position that really matters. And snubbing NATO??!!
9) The marijuana haters were convinced teen marijuana use would go way up with legalization. It hasn’t. Were they right about literally anything? These people have no credibility in a serious policy debate on how we should best regulate marijuana (and the answer sure is hell ain’t the Schedule I status quo).
10) On Jeff Sessions‘ irrational fear of drugs:
“Our nation needs to say clearly once again that using drugs will destroy your life,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions declared last week. The main problem with that message: It isn’t true.
Yes, using drugs, both legal and illegal ones, can destroy your life, but typically it doesn’t. By arguing that drug education should proceed from a false premise, Sessions reminds us what was wrong with the Just Say No propaganda he would like to revive.
11) It is truly hilarious how Trump’s pathetic intellect thinks that if he didn’t know something, other people didn’t either. (E.g., this intellectual giant just learned Lincoln was a Republican).
12) I’m a big fan of Catholic social teaching. I wish the American bishops were (they seem to be far more concerned with what gay people are up to). Anyway, love this post on how Trump’s budget violates the key principles of Catholic Social Teaching.
13) James Fallows on Trump’s wire-tapping lies and the very real cost to his credibility.
The inevitability of this moment, when a new president says Trust me, is why so many veteran officials have warned about Donald Trump’s habit of incessantly telling instantly disprovable lies. Some of the lies don’t really matter: “biggest inaugural crowd ever,” when photos showed it was comparatively small. Some of them obviously would matter, if they were true: millions of illegal voters, wiretapped by Obama. But of course they’re not true, and everyone except Trump and his coterie can look at the evidence and know that. Thus the problem: If an administration will lie about facts where the contradictory evidence is in plain sight, how can we possibly believe them on anything else?
14) Wow. The horrible, horrible conditions on buses used to transport prisoners across state lines are an embarrassment and abomination. Alas, given that this is the US criminal justice system, I can’t say I’m surprised.
15) Time to re-think the dinosaur family tree.
16) Inside the auto manufacturing boom in Alabama— dangerous working conditions.
17) Josh Barro on Trump, the bad dealmaker, is great.
18) Ezra on the matter is even better:
So what the hell happened?
The answer can be found in Trump Steaks. And Trump University. And Trump Vodka. And Trump Suits. And Trump’s fragrance line, his board game, his ghostwritten books, his energy drink, his eyeglasses, and his chocolate bars.
Yes, these are all real Trump products. And they expose the reality of Trump’s dealmaking. Trump is not a guy who makes particularly good deals so much as a guy who makes a lot of deals — many of which lash his name and reputation to garbage products.Trump, a lifelong teetotaler, didn’t scour the globe to find the very best vodka. No — someone offered him an opportunity to make a quick buck by putting his name on a product he wouldn’t ever touch and he took it. Trump University was a far darker scam. Trump Steaks were, and are, a joke.
This is Trump’s pattern: He licenses his brand and lets others worry about the details of the products. Trump’s partners often end up going out of business and his customers often end up disappointed, but Trump makes some money, and he gets his name out there, and it’s all good.
This was Trump’s approach to the health care bill, too. He let someone else worry about the product and he simply licensed his name, marketing support, and political capital. Trump didn’t know what was in the American Health Care Act, and he didn’t much care. It broke his promises to ensure health care for everyone, to protect Medicaid from cuts, to lower deductibles, and to guarantee choices of doctors and plans — but he didn’t pay attention to any of that. In private, Trump was apparently bored by the subject and eager to move onto tax reform.But being president of the United States isn’t like being a downmarket consumer brand. The products you put your name on matter. And the deal isn’t done once you’ve appeared at the ribbon-cutting and hyped up the project. You still need to persuade members of Congress to vote for the bill — and they’re apt to wonder what will happen to them when 24 million people lose their health insurance and millions more find themselves forced into crummier, higher-deductible care.
19) It’s just insane how so many Republicans think it the height of injustice that men buy health insurance plans that cover mammograms and childbirth.
20) Ezra on how Ryan has played Trump is terrific.
21) I make no apologies for being a “distracted” parent when my kids were younger. Little kids are great. They can also be boring.
22) And, we’ll conclude with Alec MacGillis’ terrific piece from 5 years ago (and so relevant today) where he sees through how Paul Ryan has scammed everybody into believing he’s a thoughtful policy wonk.