March 19, 2017 Leave a comment
From a recent Atlantic photos of the week gallery:
Politics, health care, science, education, and pretty much anything I find interesting
March 19, 2017 Leave a comment
No, not Donald Trump. Paul Ryan. Trump is so transparently just a con man that everybody not hopelessly in his corner is well onto this fact. When it comes to Paul Ryan, though, he just lies, and lies, and lies and still manages to be covered by the media as if he’s some thoughtful policy wonk. He has already revealed his true self many many times (e.g., the hammock, his absurd lies after the CBO score). His latest in speaking about Medicaid is, perhaps, the most revealing yet of the dark heart that beats deep within his breast. Chait (who else?) on the matter:
Paul Ryan has been obsessed for his entire adult life by the single-minded goal of reducing distribution from the rich to the poor. But Ryan, who worked as a political aide before running for Congress himself, is savvy enough to recognize that social Darwinism is not a promising basis for a national platform. And so, when he burst onto the national scene, he positioned himself as an earnest, thoughtful policy wonk whose primary interest was in saving the country from a fiscal crisis. Subsequently, when the facts began to catch up to him, Ryan made a huge deal about his allegedly deep commitment to poverty, a messaging ploy that worked quite well. But, in an uncharacteristic fit of candor, he burst out today to National Review editor Rich Lowry, in support of his plan to cut spending on Medicaid, that “We’ve been dreaming of this since you and I were drinking out of a keg.” [emphasis mine]
Will press coverage of Paul Ryan change? I suspect not. We’ll still keep hearing about the thoughtful wonk who cares about balancing the budget and really does want to help the poor. The reality, though? It’s pretty damn apparent.
March 19, 2017 9 Comments
1) Dana Goldstein reviews a new book on the for-profit college scam.
2) Costs/benefit-wise, guns in the home–especially due to dramatically heightened suicide risk– fail miserably.
3) Love a good, negative review, like the one of the new book Convergence arguing that everything is all coming together:
Watson’s apparent mastery of the ingredients and recipes of all the sciences might stagger a general reader used to the works of mortals. What will stagger the knowledgeable is the confidence with which he presents nonsense.
4) When it comes to analyzing college basketball, I love Ken Pomeroy. Slate This article on how the metrics the NCAA uses grossly discriminate against mid-major teams is really good.
5) Sticking with college sports… all the TV money flowing in for football and basketball means that coaches of even the lowliest sports teams now well out-earn full professors.
6) Liberals are turning to MSNBC in droves. I’d prefer the NYT, but I’ll take political engagement with cable news channels with no political engagement.
7) How intellectual humility can make you a better person. I think the constant rejection of trying to get articles published probably serves academics well in this regard.
8) Impossible Foods Impossible Burger is about to massively scale up. I sure do hope this is the beginning of the end of meat.
9) Democrats are divided on how to approach Gorsuch. Here’s an idea– it’s Merrick Garland’s seat.
10) A looming future of antibiotic resistance? Maybe. But I’m actually an optimist on what scientists will be able to accomplish on this.
11) Kevin Drum is right that fiscal conservatives should love national healthcare. The problem is, more than they like saving money, they hate giving government benefits to people they think do not deserve them. Drum with the key reason national health care saves money:
It’s ironic, but it turns out that central governments are a lot better at keeping a lid on health care costs than the private sector. The reason is taxes. National health care is paid for out of tax revenue, and the public pressure to keep taxes low is so strong that it universally translates into strong government pressure to keep health care costs low. By contrast, the private sector is so splintered that no corporation has the leverage to demand significantly lower costs. Besides, if health care costs go up, corporations can make up for it by keeping cash salaries low. This is part of the reason that median incomes have grown so slowly over the past 15 years. Corporations simply don’t care enough about high health care costs to really do anything about it.
12) Why do comedians laugh at their own jokes?
13) Chait with a great piece on Ryan, Trump, health care, and taxes:
Liberals have been warning for years that the “alternative” Republican plan that could actually pass Congress was a mirage. There was no plan that could be both acceptable to conservative anti-government ideology and to the broader public. The dilemma Republicans find themselves in now — a plan that subsidizes too little coverage to be acceptable to vulnerable members, and too much coverage for the party’s right wing — has always been unavoidable. Whoever had to write the first version of the Republican health-care bill that would have to be scored by the Congressional Budget Office and pass both chambers was given a task with impossible parameters. Ryan is being turned into the fall guy for eight years of lies that the entire Republican party, himself included, told the country and itself.
However, Ryan does appear to be the mastermind behind the legislative sequence Trump has agreed to. The plan is rooted in Ryan’s obsessive quest to pass a huge tax cut for the rich that will be permanent. That strategy requires a series of difficult steps, which — if carried out correctly at every turn — will ultimately culminate in a massive tax cut that can be scored by the Congressional Budget Office as revenue-neutral after ten years, and thus avoid the arcane budgetary requirement that caused the Bush tax cuts to expire automatically after a decade. This intricate calculation, based on complying with the Senate’s budget rules, is the linchpin of the entire Republican legislative strategy.
14) Sometimes it really takes just a little bit of money to get a college student over the finishing line. Good to see that some colleges realize what a good investment this is.
15) Unlike the rest of Europe, anti-immigrant, right-wing parties are making little headway in Spain. Read the NPR story to find out why.
16) A student recently shared this with me– I missed it last year. How Denmark treats their prisoners well and it is a win for everybody:
Still, the value of Denmark’s example to a reform-minded public lies not in replicating its particular strategies or techniques but in adopting its broader ethos — one that grants prisoners dignity and allows room for error.
This is a lesson that the United States needs to learn. The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world, yet we have little to show for either the money invested or the lives lost to this system. U.S. prisoners wear anonymous facility garb, eat mass produced food in assembly cafeteria lines, and spend hours on end in tiny, bleak cement cells. As President Obama noted this past week, as many as 100,000 prisoners across the United States are housed in solitary confinement. Hundreds of these prisoners are released directly to the streets every year, often with dangerous consequences: two went on shooting rampages upon release in 2013…
Officials say a zero tolerance policy is the only way to ensure safety in a facility full of felons. But in reality, such policies do little. Prisoners use drugs, escape and recidivate. In spite of invasive search routines for prisoners and visitors alike, prisons across the United States report problems with contraband from drugs to cellphones to prison-made knives. Even though U.S. prisoners are not permitted to have knives or prepare their own food for safety reasons, in 2011 the Supreme Court found that one California prisoner died unnecessarily every week — lives lost not to violence, but to medical negligence. And when a prisoner escaped from Clinton Correctional Facility in New York in June 2015, more than 60 prisoners complained of a backlash of abusive beatings. Danish prison officials say that their prisoners act out less because they are treated humanely; they, too, are allowed to make mistakes. [emphasis mine]
17) Should have had this last week. No, smartphones are not luxury items. Giving up your Iphone does not exactly save you enough to buy health insurance. Only out-of-touch Republican legislators seem to think so.
18) Dahlia Lithwick on how Trump’s own words were a key in knocking down travel ban 2.o.
19) William Ayers on political conflict on campus:
20) Speaking of which, NC State students not particularly big fans of free speech:
21) Last, and certainly not least, the latest research strongly suggests that Voter ID laws do not reduce turnout. If you are a liberal, you were probably too ready to believe the earlier research that they do. To be clear, I still strongly oppose Voter ID laws because they are a solution to a problem that does not exist and do disproportionately impact minorities and young people. Just because they are not as effective at demobilization as their Republican sponsors hoped, does not make them okay.