How to unmotivated reason
January 15, 2017 Leave a comment
Good enough column from Kathleen Parker on the impact of Comey. What I really like is her nice extended “what if” metaphor that is a exemplar on how to practice thinking about politics to get past your own biases:
For the undecided (or the unpersuadable), let’s pose a hypothetical: What if Clinton had publicly asked Russia to hack Trump’s records and release his tax returns — and Russia did? And what if the FBI announced less than two weeks before Election Day that it was going to investigate fraudulent practices at Trump University? Let’s say that Trump’s number dipped dramatically and he lost.
Do you reckon Republicans would be a tad upset?
Yep. It’s honestly not that hard. Just substitute Republican for Democrat or Trump for Obama (or vice versa) in your mind and be honest with yourself, which hopefully, isn’t that hard, and it’s a lot easier to think and analyze politics without being a slave to motivated reasoning.