Re-thinking equality of opportunity
September 21, 2015 4 Comments
Fascinating essay from Dylan Matthews that asks to re-think the concept of equality of opportunity. It short– it’s actually not something we want. He makes a pretty compelling argument. I really liked this part:
The motivation to work hard and make a serious effort isn’t simply a personal choice. It’s the result of millions of environmental and genetic factors: Did your parents push you growing up? Are you predisposed to depression? Did you go to a good school? Were you held as an infant? Did you inhale lead fumes as a child? The ability to work hard is a privilege, spread unevenly across genomes and households, with more going to the rich than to the poor. People who struggle with motivation due to factors beyond their control — be it genetics or mental illness or socioeconomic deprivation — do not deserve our scorn. They deserve our help. [emphasis mine]
Elites like to talk about effort because it justifies their own positions. It provides a non-arbitrary explanation for their wealth and privilege. It offers an excuse for elites to look out for disadvantaged people with whom they empathize, and not those with whom they feel no kinship. We look at an oft-suspended kid with a 1.4 GPA and see a delinquent. We look at a violinist with a 4.0 and see ourselves. And so we wind up helping the one who needs less help to begin with.
I love the emboldened paragraph because it so reflects my views. Yes, I’ve done quite well in life. I’m smart and reasonably hard-working. I just won the genetic lottery with my intellect and emotional stability. And on the non-genetics side, I was raised by well above average parents in a stable, middle-class home. All of that has helped me. I even suspect there’s a pretty good genetic component to being hard-working. But even if there’s not, did I choose to be hard-working, or is it more likely that being the product of good parents in a particular community helped me to be hard-working? I’m definitely with the latter. So, if we actually just go by equality of opportunity, the rich (not just in money, of course) just get richer. So, what do we aim for?
That’s because they’re outcomes, the thing opportunity egalitarians define themselves in opposition to. By embracing them, we give ourselves goals to strive for, a basis to determine if our politics are working, a clear path forward. By rejecting them, we are left with a morass of conceptual confusion. Equality of opportunity is a distraction. It takes our eyes off the prize. And in the process, it perpetuates the logic that lets actualinequality fester. The sooner we stop talking about mobility and opportunity and start talking about poverty and suffering, the sooner we can solve these problems.
Equality of opportunity is not the goal. The goal is a good life for all. We should settle for nothing less.
Good stuff. Sure got this advocate of “equality of opportunity” thinking.
Recent Comments