Why professors are liberal

[I meant to post this last week, but forgot.  Fortunately, it's not exactly time-dependent.]

Great article in the New York Times about some really interesting research that nicely explains why such a preponderance of college professors are liberal.

The overwhelmingly liberal tilt of university professors has been
explained by everything from outright bias to higher I.Q. scores. Now
new research suggests that critics may have been asking the wrong
question. Instead of looking at why most professors are liberal, they
should ask why so many liberals — and so few conservatives — want to be
professors.

A pair of sociologists think they may have an answer: typecasting.
Conjure up the classic image of a humanities or social sciences
professor, the fields where the imbalance is greatest: tweed jacket,
pipe, nerdy, longwinded, secular — and liberal. Even though that may be
an outdated stereotype, it influences younger people’s ideas about what
they want to be when they grow up.

That's a nice addition to our understanding, but, there's a number of other key relationships as well:

Typecasting, of course, is not the only cause for the liberal tilt. The
characteristics that define one’s political orientation are also at the
fore of certain jobs, the sociologists reported. Nearly half of the
political lopsidedness in academia can be traced to four
characteristics that liberals in general, and professors in particular,
share: advanced degrees; a nonconservative religious theology (which
includes liberal Protestants and Jews, and the nonreligious); an
expressed tolerance for controversial ideas; and a disparity between
education and income.

Well, give me a check mark on all four of those.  I still remember when my mentor as an undergraduate, Paul Gronke, explained the last point– lots of education, not so great income.  No complaints here, though.

I'll also mention that it, in my experience, it is decidedly not ideological bias of present faculty.  I've been on many a hiring decision and not once has the job candidate's political beliefs come up as a matter of serious discussion.

Advertisements

Make the call

Believe it or not, I actually called the office of one of my members of Congress for the first time ever.  I've sent a fair number of emails in my day, but I know that calls are definitely more persuasive.  After consistent goading from Kevin Drum, I decided that Kay Hagan needs to get some calls telling her to publicly come out as supporting a Senate reconciliation bill on health care reform to encourage House Democrats to pass the Senate bill.  It seems pretty clear that if 50 Democratic Senators commit to this, the House will pass the Senate bill and we'll actually have health care reform.  I'd call the White House, too, if I thought it would make any difference.  As of now, I'm very disappointed in Obama.  Hopefully, he can change that tonight, but I have my doubts.  Anyway, if you care about seeing health care reform and have a Democratic Senator, you know what to do…

Chart of the Day

Via Matt Yglesias.  When it comes to our long-term budget problems Social Security is an almost complete red herring:

challenges26 1
And furthermore, a terrific graphical explanation on why we need to get health care costs under control.  I was also intrigued to see that this came from Perotcharts.com— some more interesting (and some misleading) charts there. 

%d bloggers like this: