December 6, 2012 Leave a comment
Apparently dashboard cams are all the rage in Russia. Makes for some pretty amazing video of accidents:
Politics, parenting, science, education, and pretty much anything I find interesting
Proposals to deal with the fiscal cliff (via Matthew O’Brien):
There’s lots of great explanation, too. Here’s what O’Brien has to say on the Republican chart:
This looks like a real plan, but it’s more like a facsimile of a sketch of a real plan. Republicans say they’re willing to increase revenues by $800 but they aren’t willing to say how exactly. A $50,000 deduction cap like Romney proposed during the campaign would get them most of the way there, if they kept rates where they are now. But Republicans don’t want to keep rates where they are now. They want to cut rates. That likely takes their tax plan into the realm of mathematical impossibility, as Greg Sargent of the Washington Post points out. There’s not much more specificity on the spending side. Republicans wants $600 billion in healthcare cuts, but they’ve only identified $100 billion or so of them — that’s how much money the Congressional Budget Office estimates raising the Medicare age to 67 would save over the next decade.
Anyway, a really handy summary of the various proposals.
I meant to post this when it was brand new, but I was slow, and PPP’s latest hoisting of Republicans by their petard has exploded all over the liberal blogosphere and beyond. Anyway, PPP
PPP’s first post election national poll finds that Republicans are taking the results pretty hard…and also declining in numbers.
49% of GOP voters nationally say they think that ACORN stole the election for President Obama. Wefound that 52% of Republicans thought that ACORN stole the 2008 election for Obama, so this is a modest decline, but perhaps smaller than might have been expected given that ACORN doesn’t exist anymore. [emphasis mine]
And if that’s not enough, PPP chooses to embarrass the whole electorate:
-As much of an obsession as Bowles/Simpson can be for the DC pundit class, most Americans don’t have an opinion about it. 23% support it, 16% oppose it, and 60% say they don’t have a take one way or the other.
The 39% of Americans with an opinion about Bowles/Simpson is only slightly higher than the 25% with one about Panetta/Burns, a mythical Clinton Chief of Staff/former western Republican Senator combo we conceived of to test how many people would say they had an opinion even about something that doesn’t exist.
Not surprising– there’s a nice long history of Americans have opinions on things that don’t actually exist (including alien abductions :-) ), But, on both scores, these PPP results are very much a reminder of the limits of public opinion polling. First, I really and truly doubt that half of Republicans truly believe this. In the absence of FOX, Rush, etc., pushing it, this isn’t your typical misinformed view. Rather, it’s much more likely just an irrational expression of dissatisfaction with the election results. My favorite– but never asked– follow up question is, “really?” I’m sure a few more questions would show that most Republicans don’t really adopt this view. And on the second point, sure Americans know who they are going to vote for in an presidential election, but when you start getting into complicated policy matters, most of the public really doesn’t have a clue. The 60% without a position on Simpson/Bowles are just the most honest.
Anyway, this even made it onto Colbert (he also wonderfully skewers them on the disabilities treaty):
infographicAt least when it comes to voter turnout. You probably heard for months about the big Republican advantage in voter enthusiasm. As this nice shows, all that enthusiasm doesn’t really matter all that much:
Now, when it comes to teaching, on the other hand, among the strongest correlates of overall teacher evaluation is teach enthusiasm. I like to see that as one of the benefits of having lots of caffeine (via many Diet Coke refills) before my afternoon classes (the downside is the frequent trips to the restroom).
As you know, I love Big Picture’s “Daily Life” series. It was hard to pick one, but I went with the following photo in Berlin, as I am reading the excellent In the Garden of Beasts, which is set there (and, it’s an awesome shot):
Trees decorated with Christmas lights are reflected in a puddle as people walk along the Unter den Linden promenade at dusk in Berlin on Nov. 28. (Thomas Peter/Reuters)
There are some thinktanks– even right-leaning ones– that deserve the “think” in there name. Heritage has never been one of those places. It exists mostly to provide a pseudo-scholarly veneer to whatever it is the Republican Party wants to do. Thus, not surprising that they should name beloved Tea Party Senator Jim Demint as their new head. Loved Ezra’s reaction:
To state the obvious, you don't make Jim DeMint the head of your think tank in order to improve the quality of your scholarship.—
Ezra Klein (@ezraklein) December 06, 2012
My friend on the Hill has been around a lot of Senators in his time. His take on Demint– just astounded that a United States Senator could really be that stupid. Maybe we need to invent a new name for Heritage as thinktank surely doesn’t cover it.
Via Gallup– it turns out that most opponensts of same-sex marraige object for religious reasons:
And actually, it’s hard not to consider choices two and three as religion based as well. Anyway, not surprising, but still interesting to see. And, they also provide the age breakdown (as well as party and church attendance), which is more stark than ever:
Those young Americans are not going to become more conservative on this. Rather, due to demographic replacement there will almost surely be a point where a large majority in favor. As I say, if you are conservative on social issues, keep fighting on abortion, you’ve got something going there and there’s not a dramatic age disparity. When it comes to gay marriage, the writing is on the wall in a glittery sharpie.