June 5, 2011 Leave a comment
Great entry by Bruce Bartlett in the Times’ Economix blog about our current tax rate and the absurd Republican talking points on the matter (in case you didn’t know, Bartless has impeachable GOP credentials, but has become an apostate for rejecting the theological doctrine that taxes should always be cut no matter what). Some highlights:
Historically, the term “tax rate” has meant the average or effective tax rate — that is, taxes as a share of income. The broadest measure of the tax rate is total federal revenues divided by the gross domestic product.
By this measure, federal taxes are at their lowest level in more than 60 years. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that federal taxes would consume just 14.8 percent of G.D.P. this year. The last year in which revenues were lower was 1950, according to the Office of Management and Budget.
The postwar annual average is about 18.5 percent of G.D.P. Revenues averaged 18.2 percent of G.D.P. during Ronald Reagan’s administration; the lowest percentage during that administration was 17.3 percent of G.D.P. in 1984.
In short, by the broadest measure of the tax rate, the current level is unusually low and has been for some time. Revenues were 14.9 percent of G.D.P. in both 2009 and 2010.
There’s just no way to spin this as anything but the fact that we have historically low taxes right now. Not that all these number have stopped Republicans from doing so:
Yet if one listens to Republicans, one would think that taxes have never been higher, that an excessive tax burden is the most important constraint holding back economic growth and that a big tax cut is exactly what the economy needs to get growing again.
The rest of the column basically just shoots down many of the Republican talking points on taxes. You might want to read it if you ever argue with Republicans over taxation issues. The conclusion sums things up quite well:
The truth of the matter is that federal taxes in the United States are very low. There is no reason to believe that reducing them further will do anything to raise growth or reduce unemployment. [emphasis mine]