Americans for America

I enjoy making fun of all the absurd names of political 527′s, e.g., Americans for Job Security, Americans for Prosperity, etc., so I’ve always used “Americans for America” as what I thought was just a joke on the silliness of these names.  Turns out they’re real! And much to my dismay, a liberal group.

Anyway, now you can make up your own 527 name via the Sunlight Foundation: (they actually have an embed code, but stupid WordPress is too damn paranoid about embeds, so you’ll have to click the link).

Chart of the day

Via Ezra Klein:

budgetforeignaid.jpg

Source.

This is one of my “favorite” misperceptions about American politics.  If I had a dollar for everybody who thought we could solve our budget problems just by cutting foreign aid, I’d be a very rich man.  I always spend some time on this little factoid in my Intro to American Government class.  Most students are pretty much shocked to find out that foreign aid is less than 1% of the budget.

As for the 11-12% that people seem ready to spend on foreign aid, I really would not put a lot of stock in that.  Classic example of the anchoring effect.  They are using the anchor of the 1/4 of the budget that they think it is (on average, obviously)  and then thinking half of that sounds more reasonable.  If you simply told people we spend about 1% of the budget on foreign aid and then asked them what we should spend, I bet it would still be lower.  Certainly not 12%.

Leads me to a series of experiments on just how amazingly irrational people are with numbers (that I think I recall reading about in Dan Ariely’s Predictably Irrational). Ask people the last two digits of their social security number and them ask them what they think you should pay for a good bottle of wine.  Obviously, there should be no relationship between the two numbers you get, but those XXX-XX-XX94 people ending up willing to spend a lot more on a good bottle of wine than the XXX-XX-XX04 people.  Once that 94 or 4 or whatever is in your head, it influences judgments which are completely independent.  Nobody who knows what they’re talking about ever suggested humans are actually rational thinkers.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 307 other followers

%d bloggers like this: